The Death Of
The Dark Energy Idea

Note: As the cover says this is a living 1st edition. I decided to publish it with teasers to topics that future editions will have more information and quoted sources, and some parts cannot be expanded upon until I can pay for the content of material from other sources. Please be patient.

There is now a first abridged color edition of the book. With a font size of 14 for easier reading.

The link is not working directly between all three versions of the book. So if you want to purchase the larger sized edition you may need to either search for B091DBHY66 in the normal book category or enter on Amazon the entire link: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B091DBHY66

A fatal flaw in the most fundamental model of nature has been overlooked for so long that many people do not question it. The transverse wave model of photons has failed at almost every prediction its proponents made. And the proof of its validity as a model for photons has failed to consider that longitudinal waves accomplish the same thing in most experiments.

Extraordinary claims demand evidence, not excuses or waving off the explanation to another dimension or particle. Dark energy is based on the apparent redshift of most of the visible universe, and since transverse wave photons have no apparent mechanism to become red-shifted the conclusion made was the entire universe must be expanding. And dark energy must be the cause.

Despite the obvious failures of the transverse wave photon model, and inconvenient facts like that of longitudinal density waves behaving in a similar manner in a number of experiments.
Longitudinal density waves also experience gap diffraction, produce the same electrical-magnetic profile if you consider varying density, and that a longitudinal wave with an elliptical profile is polarizable. These were the key proofs that photons had to be transverse waves. Yet, longitudinal density waves accomplish the same thing.

More importantly they spread out naturally as you can’t keep a longitudinal wave focused so that is does not disperse. And thus, they become red-shifted naturally. No need for dark energy, an expanding universe and no big bang. Add to that the varying density, and you automatically get the photoelectric effect, and no UV Catastrophe. In contrast, the transverse wave model failed at predicting the photoelectric effect and ended up with the UV Catastrophe.

As a bonus, you get an entirely new physical model for electrons and positrons, and it looks like a physical explanation for their electrical properties. And with that, answers to many questions that others failed to realized this path could lead to. Potential physical explanations that make sense. Unlike those who try to defer an answer to another particle or dimension.

The James Webb Space Telescope will reveal more distant objects simply because the infrared photons will still allow a source to be determined for these extremely red-shifted photons.

The Higgs field and mechanism become a moot point since the effect is a natural part of longitudinal density-wave behavior, and the Higgs particle is not necessary. The discovery of the Higgs particle is at best the mistaken identity of a particle that is around the right corrected-guestimated mass, but not what they claim to have discovered. See the book – The Higgs Fake by Alexander Unzicker.

Einstein considered the same basis of a path to a solution to the problems he saw, but he was actually discouraged by others to follow this line of reasoning and where it might lead. The “ghost waves” lead to a mechanical solution to various mysteries he pondered. As well as a physical explanation for spooky-action-at-a-distance.

It did not occur to me until recently that this is for all purposes the elusive – “Theory of Everything!”

The Muon g−2 experiments, which you may have heard about
in the news recently (2021-04), refers to a particle physics experiment at the
Fermilab, near Chicago, to measure to a higher precision the anomalous magnetic
dipole moment of a muon. This test is supposed to either validate or bring into
question the thoroughness, or possibly even the validity, of the Standard
Model. The latest results have been interpreted to provide evidence of the possibility
of the existence of an entirely new type of particle, or that they do not fully
understand something.

Even the classical Dirac equation for the magnetic moment
of the electron differs by only a small fraction of a percent from the
experimentally observed data. The difference of the two, the classically predicted
versus the measured values, is referred to as the anomalous magnetic moment.

This is an opportunity for someone to come up with a mathematical description for various parts of this model.

See the link within the book for more information about the contest/challenge that is being developed. Legal considerations may need me alter the conditions and dates. Conditions and dates not yet set.